DPA Projection
China Invasion of Taiwan
PROJECTION UPDATE (13 May 2025)
- In a surprise U-turn by China, after strong words of not talking to USA or negotiating with USA without USA first eliminating their tariffs on China, China delegation met with USA delegation at Geneva, Switzerland between 10-12 May 2025.
- China and USA both agree to drop reciprocal-retaliation tariffs to 10% for 90 days - effectively setting the minimum tariff on each sides to 10% vs 30%. Read more about the deal here.
- The softening stance by China may be a signal of prioritization over stabilizing internal economic problems over challenging US hegemony - thus reducing the threat of using war on Taiwan to militarily-strategically defeat US influence/presence in the region.
- DPA assess the risk to drop from 50% to 40% - given the trade war respite is only for 90 days - and with the nearly insurmountable economic challenge facing China internally, China may not necessarily be able to offer a deal that USA want, and the high tariffs may return after the end of the 90 days.
PROJECTION UPDATE (7 April 2025)
- Trump administration's "New World Order" via international trade and economic reforms have a strong leaning towards isolating China or to force China to reform its economic policies.
- China is unlikely and possibly, literally unable to accede to any of the demands of Trump due to internal economic turmoil/problems.
- China's economic stability/growth is entirely underpinned by the enormous export numbers, and the export have to continue to grow in order to keep up with management of the enormous debt and poor internal economic situation - any reduction to export would hit twice as hard on China than usual for any other countries.
- The most opportune time frame / window to invade Taiwan has closed tremendously due to Trump's election:Trump has revigorated the US military recruitment & focus, massive investment into US military as well as remedying US military weakness, including investment into 6th Gen fighters, reinvestment in ship building as well as bringing back manufacturing that could improve US's war time production.
- China's military advantage on the Taiwan straits will be reduced with every passing month, as USA will complete its full redeployment/focus of its military from Europe to Asia, as well as introduction of new weaponry that is being ordered into production right now.
- If China's economic situation gets heavily hit by Trump economic/trade war assaults (especially Trump successfully gets many countries to cut/reduce trade with China) - China economic turmoil may create a lot more internal political problems than the Communist Party could deal with - which makes an invasion of Taiwan very unpopular with the citizens, whose concerns may be more on economic issues.
- Which again means that the only time frame in which China could launch an invasion with popular support would be, BEFORE such economic problem occur.
- China could also use "a war" in Taiwan to create a massive disruption, in order to fight off Trump's trade/economic offensive; similar to China's deliberate attempt to allow Covid-19 to go global to starve off the 2020 trade war situation, which China was losing/on the back foot.
- An invasion of Taiwan would also put Trump in a bad spot, as Trump runs on a no-war position - a prolonged military campaign in Taiwan stretching to the mid-terms in the US, could also potentially cause the Republican Party to lose either the House or Senate, crippling Trump's ability to conduct further effective reforms/actions in the USA.
- An invasion of Taiwan, would also test the will of USA to defend Taiwan - on top of that, the will of Japan, South Korea and the rest of US-allies/partners to side of USA on the conflict.
- Failure of the allies and partners to answer US' call to action to help defend Taiwan would effectively destroy US prestige and global leadership for good.
KEYSTONE DEVELOPMENT (2 April 2025)
- USA slaps minimum 10% tariff on all countries
- Tariff on China imports is now at 54%, putting tremendous pressure on Chinese imports into USA
- All countries are likely to enter trade negotiations with Trump.
- China had retaliated against the US "Liberation Day" tariff by announcing 34% tariff on all US goods. Including 10%-15% duties on certain products, certain products may now have 49% tariff.
DPA Projection (7 April 2025):
DPA believe that Trump administration, with the intention to prevent Chinese goods from avoiding the tariff via 3rd country, will force every country, particularly Mexico, Canada, Vietnam, Indonesia, etc... to either cut/reduce trade with China, or risk having the tariff stay at current high numbers (as per announced on 2nd April 2025 aka Liberation Day).
DEVELOPMENT (March 2025)
- A confidential Pentagon memo revealed that deterring a Chinese takeover of Taiwan has become a U.S. military priority. This aligns with proposals to reallocate defense resources, potentially increasing funding for commands focused on China.
- Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth stated that the United States is "no longer primarily focused" on Europe's security and emphasized that European nations need to assume greater responsibility for their own defense. This shift allows the U.S. to reallocate military resources toward addressing challenges in Asia, particularly concerning China's growing influence.
- Vice President JD Vance echoed this sentiment at the 2024 Munich Security Conference, asserting that the U.S. must prioritize East Asia and that European countries should increase their defense spending to ensure their own security.
- Reports suggest that the U.S. is considering adjusting the role of its forces stationed in South Korea, shifting focus from deterring North Korea to addressing broader regional challenges, particularly concerning China.
DPA Projection (7 April 2025):
DPA assess that we will soon be seeing increased military deployments to US bases in the Asia Pacific in the near future.
However, this will likely only happen after USA resolves the immediate problems with Iran as well as with the Houthis in Yemen.
Projection Archives
The Two Koreas: Why North Korea’s Constitutional Change is Fantastic News for Peace
Good news. Very, very good news. The world is actually moving towards a more peaceful setup in one of its most dangerous flashpoints. I’ve mentioned this before—perhaps a year or two ago—that the ideal solution for the Korean peninsula is simply for both sides to accept that they are two different countries and give up…
Ukraine War Situation Report: Victory Day Ceasefire Games, Drone War Stalemate, and Frontline Updates (April 27 – May 5)
The Macro Situation: Victory Day Ceasefire and Drone Threats The Russians have unilaterally declared a two-day ceasefire from May 8th to 9th for their Victory Day celebrations. They didn’t consult the Ukrainians; they just announced it and threatened to hammer Kyiv if Ukraine disrupts the parade. Unsurprisingly, Zelensky and the Ukrainians immediately rejected it. Nobody…
Indonesia Strengthens Naval Deterrence with Indian Brahmos Missiles
In a significant shift for Southeast Asian regional security, Indonesia has confirmed a deal with India to procure the Brahmos supersonic anti-ship missile system. This move follows in the footsteps of the Philippines, making Indonesia the second foreign customer for the Indo-Russian joint venture. Key Highlights of the Deal Strategic Deployment: The Natuna Islands A…
Precision Lethality: The U.S. Navy’s $1 Billion “Ship-Killer” Investment
In a significant escalation of its maritime strike capabilities, the U.S. Navy has submitted a funding request to Congress in April 2026 for the purchase of 177 Long-Range Anti-Ship Missiles (LRASM). Valued at approximately $970 million, this procurement is not a one-off purchase but the latest move in an aggressive, multi-year strategy to stockpile advanced…
The Great Pivot: Why the UAE Just Quit OPEC and Went All-In on the USA
In a move that has sent shockwaves through global energy markets and geopolitical circles, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has officially announced its withdrawal from OPEC and the OPEC+ alliance, effective May 1, 2026. This isn’t just a change in oil policy—it’s a massive geopolitical realignment. The UAE is no longer content playing “second fiddle”…
The Moscow Pivot: Iran’s Disillusionment with China and the Rush for Russian Expertise
In a move that signals a seismic shift in Middle Eastern power dynamics, Iranian leadership has pivoted sharply toward the Kremlin. Following the recent pause in the 40-day conflict with the United States and Israel, the Iranian Foreign Minister traveled to Moscow for a high-stakes meeting with Vladimir Putin. This visit is not merely a…
Ukraine 2000–2022 | How to Destroy a Nation: Part 3 (END)
First Published on https://carloperoni.substack.com/p/ukraine-20002022-how-to-destroy-a-4dd?r=5l7dpt In the previous article, we left off with President Yanukovych fleeing Kyiv after the devastating violence in Maidan Square. This event would lead to the formation of a new government and the beginning of a long civil war, whose brutality would later escalate into the worst human catastrophe of modern European…
Nepal’s revolution reveals insanity in analysis and oxymoron in information consumers
People/analysts had been obsessed over their conspiracy theories on whether Nepal is a CIA/West initiated color revolution… ….but no one really cares what the population really think/feel. The Nepali people are very happy with the overthrowing of the government. “wehatethecold” shows the reality after the overthrow with the military curfew – unfiltered. You really need…
Woke is not political… and why the Woke are Elks now facing introduced wolves…
Personally, I think what is missing in today’s age – which I learnt it the hard way when I entered adulthood – was the concept of taking responsibility for what you say and do; and that your feelings dont matter at all In reality, no one cares how you feel, and you have to learn…
Thailand-Cambodia War will become the Trojan Horse for a permanent China military presence in Indochina
As I had reported in my Day 1 SITREP on the Thailand – Cambodia conflict, it was extremely unclear as to why, the weaker and smaller country of the two, whom also have a military that is a lot weaker than it’s adversary, would decide to “ask for a war” by shelling civilian areas with…

